01
Start with your decision
Choose a research space and name your project. Add the context that matters: your goals, priorities, budget, or current version.
The research workflowA place for your sources.
A place for your sources.
A path to your next step.
Keep the evidence close as you move from an open question to a decision you can explain.
Make room for clarityBring the sources.
Bring the sources.
Follow the evidence.
02
Add sources you choose
Paste supported public links from videos, posts, articles, PDFs, and text documents. Keep the original perspectives in reach.
03
See how it fits together
Explore findings by category, compare source positions, and use the relevant brief to think through your next step.
Distribution channels
Your research, organized.
Illustrative scenario with sample source notes.
Start with conversations you can learn from
Direct conversations could help a small team learn the language and objections of a narrowly defined audience. Treat this as a hypothesis to test against your own product.
The source context2 sample notes
Founder interviewSupports
The founder describes learning from individual customer conversations before building a repeatable channel.
Launch retrospectiveAdds context
A small initial audience made hands-on outreach practical; results depended on a specific customer segment.
Content or outreach? Stage changes the answer
A mature content program and an early outreach effort operate on different timelines. Compare the stage, available expertise, and expected feedback loop before choosing a channel.
The source context2 sample notes
Growth case studyContent-led approach
The example describes an established team investing in content over a longer period.
Founder interviewDirect outreach
The example describes a small team seeking early conversations with a narrow audience.
An experiment needs a baseline
A proposed outreach experiment needs an observation period and a baseline before anyone can judge improvement. The source stories cannot supply your own starting conversion rate.
The source context1 sample note
Your project contextUnknown baseline
Owner observations can describe your starting point; they do not count as independent source evidence.
Usability
Your research, organized.
Illustrative scenario with sample source notes.
The camera you carry matters
A smaller setup may fit everyday photography, while a heavier setup may suit a planned video shoot. Compare the work each reviewer expects the camera to do.
The source context2 sample notes
Everyday photography reviewValues portability
The illustrative reviewer prioritizes a setup that can be carried throughout the day.
Hands-on video reviewAdds a tradeoff
The illustrative reviewer accepts extra weight for a dedicated filming setup.
Video performance is not the whole decision
A video-focused test can be informative without settling the choice for a stills photographer. Keep resolution, handling, and tested workload beside the review.
The source context2 sample notes
Hands-on video reviewVideo workload
The sample note emphasizes long recording sessions.
Everyday photography reviewPhotography workload
The sample note emphasizes fast handling during short daily outings.
Long-term reliability needs long-term evidence
Early impressions can describe build and handling. They cannot establish the long-term reliability of the same model under your conditions.
The source context1 sample note
First-impression videoShort observation
The illustrative source describes only initial use.
Compatibility and ecosystem
Your research, organized.
Illustrative scenario with sample source notes.
Check your integrations before upgrading
A new release may offer useful capabilities while compatibility with a required integration remains unknown. Keep that dependency visible in the adoption decision.
The source context2 sample notes
Release notesOfficial change
The sample notes describe a new capability in the target release.
Migration guideCompatibility condition
The sample guide identifies an integration that requires a separate compatibility check.
A benchmark is only as relevant as its workload
An improvement in one benchmark does not establish the same result for your application. Compare the observed version, environment, and workload before treating the result as applicable.
The source context2 sample notes
Independent testSpecific workload
This illustrative test describes one workload and environment.
Your project contextDifferent environment
Your environment still needs a representative evaluation.
More evidence may be the right conclusion
Missing exact-version or compatibility evidence should stay visible. Donde can retain uncertainty instead of forcing a confident upgrade recommendation.
The source context1 sample note
Evidence reviewMissing coverage
No sample source establishes the required compatibility for this scenario.
Stay
Your research, organized.
Illustrative scenario with sample source notes.
Choose a base around your daily plans
A central base can simplify a first visit, while a quieter area may suit a slower pace. Compare the daily routes and activities behind each recommendation.
The source context2 sample notes
First-visit guideCentral convenience
The sample guide assumes frequent walks between central sights.
Neighborhood articleA quieter base
The sample article assumes more time near the accommodation.
Lively at night can mean noisy at bedtime
The atmosphere one visitor values may be the noise another wants to avoid. Keep the preference and time of day alongside the description.
The source context2 sample notes
Evening city guideValues atmosphere
The illustrative source favors a lively evening area.
Neighborhood articleValues quiet
The illustrative source favors quieter surroundings.
Check the details close to departure
Opening hours and transport details can become outdated. A saved source gives you context, and the current official source helps verify a time-sensitive plan.
The source context1 sample note
Trip planning noteNeeds current check
The sample research does not establish current operating hours.
Explore the structure. These illustrative notes are not actual source quotations or a generated research result. How Donde handles evidence
01 · Source requirements
Start with accessible material
Public captioned videos, readable articles, PDFs, and text documents give Donde the material to analyze.
Explore 02 · Source contextInspect what is behind a finding
Compare source positions and trace the original evidence. Repeated advice is not the same as proof.
Explore 03 · Decision outputsChoose a next step with context
Growth and Technology Release have specialized decision briefs. Other spaces organize the research around their own categories.
ExploreKeep control of your research.
Projects are private by default. Invite a viewer to read a project where sharing is available; your owner-only notes stay private. Viewer access does not grant editing. Public Briefs, where available, are deliberately published snapshots.
Keep your curiosity. Lose the chaos.Your next decision
Your next decision
starts with a clearer view.
Bring a few sources. Give your research a place to come together.
Start researching free 3 lifetime source credits · No subscription required